This is because use is not specifically covered by Article 36 and the term possession in that Article and elsewhere can be read as confined to possession for the purpose of online dating webbplatser bara för sex dealing".
Rather than calling on nations to prosecute drug users, the treaty focuses on traffickers and producers.They favored strong supranational control bodies as long as they continued to exercise de facto control over such bodies.Articles 1, 2, 4, 9, 12, 19, and 49 contain provisions relating to "medical and scientific" use of controlled substances.Even if the Commission on Narcotic Drugs removed cannabis from Schedule IV of the Single Convention, prohibitions against the plant would remain imbedded in Article 28 and other parts of the treaty.Schedule II drugs are regulated only slightly less strictly than Schedule I drugs.Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.Drug diplomacy in the twentieth century: an international history, Routledge, 2000 McLaughlin, Aideen: Drugs expert warns: cannabis as dangerous to society as heroin, 13 Mar.Cannabis: Our Position for a Canadian Public Policy, Report of the Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs, Sep.6 The legal commentary was created by the United Nations Secretary-General 's staff (specifically, Adolf Lande, former Secretary of the Permanent Central kvinnor söker i leipzig Narcotics Board and Drug Supervisory Body operating under a mandate to give "an interpretation of the provisions of the Convention in the light.They favored restricting drug use to medical and scientific purposes and were willing to sacrifice a degree of national sovereignty to ensure the effectiveness of supranational control bodies.As of, 180 states were Parties to the treaty.As of 2013, 234 substances are controlled under the Single Convention.Schedule IV is the category of drugs, such as heroin, that are considered to have "particularly dangerous properties" in comparison to other drugs ( ethanol is left unregulated).
They supported national control efforts based on local conditions and were wary of strong international control bodies under the.

In a 1954 interview with Harry.
The Senlis Council, a European drug policy thinktank, proposes creating a second-tier supply system that would complement the existing system without altering the balance of its relatively closed supply and demand system.